Noometry

Model comparison

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs MiMo-V2-Flash

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 3.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.5-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi

45.2

Rank #74 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

41.3

Rank #138 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 47.4 to 36.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 50.2% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro and 25.9% for MiMo-V2-Flash.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.5-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
ProviderXiaomiXiaomi
Noometry Index45.241.3
Released2026-04-222025-12-16
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M262K
Max output131K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.43$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$0.87$0.28
Results tracked2721

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena WebDev14791330
SciCode50.2%25.9%
LMArena Coding15031443
ALE-Bench899.8737.95

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
CritPt4%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts14881420
NYT Connections (extended)34.4%—
DTBench84.5%—
LMCA29.5%—

Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Math14811396
ProofBench22%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Expert15031425

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Non-English14491392
LMArena Chinese15071462
LMArena French14881429
LMArena German14581395
LMArena Japanese14121325
LMArena Korean14371358
LMArena Russian14501387
LMArena Spanish14711420

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following14771392

Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Longer Query14831409

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Text14651411
LMArena Creative Writing14401375
LMArena Multi-Turn14771404
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1493—
EQ-Bench 41208—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 3.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.5-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5-Pro and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper