Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs MiMo-V2-Flash

Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 20× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 2.5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Google

45.0

Rank #75 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

41.3

Rank #138 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher in 7 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 59.8 to 43.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 42.8% for Gemini 2.5 Pro and 25.9% for MiMo-V2-Flash.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $10 for Gemini 2.5 Pro.
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2-Flash
ProviderGoogleXiaomi
Noometry Index45.041.3
Released2025-03-252025-12-16
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M262K
Max output66K66K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$10$0.28
Results tracked7821

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.4 (#101), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena WebDev12271330
SciCode42.8%25.9%
LMArena Coding14521443
ALE-Bench785.52737.95
SWE-bench Verified57.6%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)53.6%—
Aider Polyglot83.1%—
GSO3.9%—
WeirdML54%—
LiveBench Coding85.9%—
CadEval64%—
AlgoTune1.51—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.2 (#88), MiMo-V2-Flash: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2-Flash
Terminal-Bench32.6%—
GDPval23.3%—
Remote Labor Index0.8%—
TheAgentCompany30.3%—
τ²-bench Banking13.7%—
DeepResearch Bench42.8%—
BALROG43.3%—
LMArena Search1142—
METR Time Horizons55.4%—
Vending-Bench 2573.64—

Reasoning Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#99), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2-Flash
CritPt2%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts14551420
ARC-AGI-24.9%—
SimpleBench62.4%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark70.3%—
ARC-AGI-141%—
Chess Puzzles20%—
EnigmaEval5.6%—
LiveBench Reasoning89.8%—
DTBench82.4%—
LiveBench Data Analysis79.9%—
LMCA34.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index145.32—
ForecastBench61.3—
LiveBench82.3%—

Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 32.5 (#213), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Math14501396
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)24.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 40%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202584.7%—
Omni-MATH41.6%—
LiveBench Math90.2%—
MATH Level 595.9%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)14.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 56.0 (#46), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Expert14521425
GPQA Diamond85.3%—
Humanity's Last Exam21.6%—
MMLU-Pro86.3%—
Confabulations10.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7%—
GPQA (HELM)74.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 45.2 (#18), MiMo-V2-Flash: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Vision1263—
GeoBench86%—
VPCT48%—
LMArena Document1421—
SpatialViz-Bench44.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.3 (#31), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Non-English14511392
LMArena Chinese15071462
LMArena French14721429
LMArena German14871395
LMArena Japanese14611325
LMArena Korean14341358
LMArena Russian14611387
LMArena Spanish14731420

Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.0 (#75), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following14371392
LiveBench Instruction Following80.6%—
IFEval84%—

Long Context Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.8 (#5), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Longer Query14491409
Fiction.LiveBench91.7%—

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.7 (#62), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Text14581411
LMArena Creative Writing14541375
LMArena Multi-Turn14531404
Short-Story Creative Writing83.8%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1421—
WildBench85.7%—
LiveBench Language67.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 20× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 2.5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Gemini 2.5 Pro lists at $1.25 and $10.

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Pro and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper