Model comparison
Mercury vs Yi-34B
Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury scores higher in 5 categories and Yi-34B in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mercury leads 46.2 to 34.1.
- Yi-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mercury | Yi-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 27.8 |
| Released | — | 2023-11-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mercury leads
Mercury: 38.7 (#170), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)
| Benchmark | Mercury | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1112 |
Reasoning Yi-34B leads
Mercury: 17.5 (#293), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)
| Benchmark | Mercury | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1285 | 1104 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 21.6% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 71.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 117.39 |
Math Not comparable
Mercury: —, Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)
| Benchmark | Mercury | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1114 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 5.1% |
| GSM8K | — | 76% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mercury: —, Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)
| Benchmark | Mercury | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 14.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1061 |
| MMLU | — | 76.3% |
Multilingual Mercury leads
Mercury: 41.6 (#206), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)
| Benchmark | Mercury | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1260 | 1079 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1176 |
| LMArena French | — | 1081 |
| LMArena German | — | 1042 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 993 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 959 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1050 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1070 |
Instruction Following Mercury leads
Mercury: 65.2 (#224), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Mercury | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | 1091 |
Long Context Mercury leads
Mercury: 38.4 (#198), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)
| Benchmark | Mercury | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1266 | 1094 |
Writing & Preference Mercury leads
Mercury: 46.2 (#221), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Mercury | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1282 | 1129 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1191 | 1108 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1282 | 1113 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mercury better than Yi-34B?
Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Mercury or Yi-34B better for coding?
Mercury scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Mercury and Yi-34B share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury has 9 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.