Model comparison

Mercury vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Mercury Inception

37.6

Rank #199 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury scores higher in 6 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mercury leads 46.2 to 27.6.
  • Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mercury and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct specifications
MercuryPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderInceptionMicrosoft
Noometry Index37.627.9
Released—2024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked935

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mercury leads

Mercury: 38.7 (#170), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding13221093
LiveBench Coding—15.5%
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Reasoning Mercury leads

Mercury: 17.5 (#293), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12851072
Kagi LLM Benchmark21.6%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—26.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—34.7%
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
HellaSwag—76.7%
LiveBench—22.4%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math Not comparable

Mercury: —, Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LiveBench Math—15.7%
LMArena Math—1111

Knowledge Not comparable

Mercury: —, Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert—1045
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multilingual Mercury leads

Mercury: 41.6 (#206), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English12601021
LMArena Chinese—1021
LMArena French—1076
LMArena German—1044
LMArena Japanese—935
LMArena Korean—905
LMArena Russian—1022
LMArena Spanish—1085

Instruction Following Mercury leads

Mercury: 65.2 (#224), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12391053
LiveBench Instruction Following—39.1%

Long Context Mercury leads

Mercury: 38.4 (#198), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12661044

Writing & Preference Mercury leads

Mercury: 46.2 (#221), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text12821073
LMArena Creative Writing11911037
LMArena Multi-Turn12821018
LiveBench Language—9.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Mercury better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mercury or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

Mercury scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mercury and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury has 9 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper