Model comparison
Mercury 2 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Mercury 2 and Qwen3.7 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.8 vs 39.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 35.6.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $0.75 for Mercury 2.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| Mercury 2 | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 39.5 |
| Released | 2026-02-20 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | 1M |
| Max output | 50K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.25 | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.75 | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mercury 2: 33.2 (#250), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1170 | — |
| SciCode | 38.7% | — |
| WeirdML | 43.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1391 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.58 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Mercury 2: 23.0 (#170), Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)
| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| CritPt | 0.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1362 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.62 |
Math Not comparable
Mercury 2: —, Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)
| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Mercury 2: 35.6 (#170), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)
| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1358 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mercury 2: 46.8 (#153), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1303 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mercury 2: 70.4 (#161), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1328 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Mercury 2: 40.4 (#149), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1329 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Mercury 2: 54.0 (#151), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1289 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1358 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mercury 2 better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Mercury 2 and Qwen3.7 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.8 vs 39.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Mercury 2 or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Mercury 2 lists at $0.25 and $0.75.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Mercury 2 and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury 2 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.