Model comparison
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Qwen3.7 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.4 vs 39.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 36.1.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.4 | 39.9 |
| Released | — | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1322 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.64 |
Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1305 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1308 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1275 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1304 | — |
| LMArena French | 1328 | — |
| LMArena German | 1282 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1206 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1268 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1299 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1312 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1309 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Qwen3.7 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.4 vs 39.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.