Model comparison
Mercury 2 vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Mercury 2 leads 36.2 to 18.3.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mercury 2 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2026-02-20 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 50K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.75 | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mercury 2 leads
Mercury 2: 33.5 (#255), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1171 | — |
| SciCode | 38.7% | — |
| WeirdML | 43.2% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1391 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.58 | — |
Reasoning Mercury 2 leads
Mercury 2: 23.8 (#170), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1362 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math Not comparable
Mercury 2: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
Knowledge Mercury 2 leads
Mercury 2: 36.2 (#172), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1358 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mercury 2: 46.6 (#157), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1304 | — |
Instruction Following Mercury 2 leads
Mercury 2: 70.2 (#165), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1329 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Mercury 2: 40.5 (#154), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1330 | — |
Writing & Preference Mercury 2 leads
Mercury 2: 53.8 (#155), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1289 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1358 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mercury 2 better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Mercury 2 or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Mercury 2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.5 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Mercury 2 and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury 2 has 17 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.