Model comparison

Mercury 2 vs Ministral 8B

Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 8B costs 2.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mercury 2's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Mercury 2 Inception

39.1

Rank #175 Confirmed

Ministral 8B Mistral AI

28.2

Rank #325 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury 2 scores higher in 6 categories and Ministral 8B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Mercury 2 leads 36.2 to 12.6.
  • Ministral 8B is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $0.75 for Mercury 2.
  • Ministral 8B accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
  • Ministral 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mercury 2 and Ministral 8B specifications
Mercury 2Ministral 8B
ProviderInceptionMistral AI
Noometry Index39.128.2
Released2026-02-202024-10-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window128K262K
Max output50K262K
Input $ / M tokens$0.25$0.15
Output $ / M tokens$0.75$0.15
Results tracked1717

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Ministral 8B leads

Mercury 2: 33.5 (#255), Ministral 8B: 35.0 (#230)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2Ministral 8B
LMArena Coding13911202
LMArena WebDev1171—
SciCode38.7%—
WeirdML43.2%—
ALE-Bench785.58—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mercury 2: —, Ministral 8B: 16.4 (#148)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2Ministral 8B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—11.1%

Reasoning Mercury 2 leads

Mercury 2: 23.8 (#170), Ministral 8B: 18.4 (#281)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2Ministral 8B
LMArena Hard Prompts13621191
CritPt0.8%—
DTBench—45.7%

Math Not comparable

Mercury 2: —, Ministral 8B: 25.7 (#267)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2Ministral 8B
LMArena Math—1188
MATH Level 5—14.9%

Knowledge Mercury 2 leads

Mercury 2: 36.2 (#172), Ministral 8B: 12.6 (#297)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2Ministral 8B
Vectara Hallucination Rate12.3%7.4%
LMArena Expert13581170
GPQA Diamond—27.1%

Multilingual Mercury 2 leads

Mercury 2: 46.6 (#157), Ministral 8B: 35.1 (#247)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2Ministral 8B
LMArena Non-English13311165
LMArena Chinese14171193
LMArena Russian13041195

Instruction Following Mercury 2 leads

Mercury 2: 70.2 (#165), Ministral 8B: 60.5 (#250)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2Ministral 8B
LMArena Instruction Following13291161

Long Context Mercury 2 leads

Mercury 2: 40.5 (#154), Ministral 8B: 36.7 (#227)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2Ministral 8B
LMArena Longer Query13301212

Writing & Preference Mercury 2 leads

Mercury 2: 53.8 (#155), Ministral 8B: 39.6 (#246)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2Ministral 8B
LMArena Text13551191
LMArena Creative Writing12891175
LMArena Multi-Turn13581166

Frequently asked questions

Is Mercury 2 better than Ministral 8B?

Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 8B costs 2.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mercury 2's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Mercury 2 or Ministral 8B?

Ministral 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Mercury 2 lists at $0.25 and $0.75.

Is Mercury 2 or Ministral 8B better for coding?

Ministral 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.0 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Ministral 8B does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Mercury 2 and Ministral 8B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury 2 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 8B has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper