Model comparison

Mercury 2 vs MiniMax M1

Mercury 2 and MiniMax M1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.8 vs 39.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Mercury 2 Inception

38.8

Rank #167 Confirmed

MiniMax M1 MiniMax

39.7

Rank #146 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury 2 scores higher in 3 categories and MiniMax M1 in 4 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where MiniMax M1 leads 39.2 to 33.2.
  • Mercury 2 is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.75 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2.20 for MiniMax M1.
  • MiniMax M1 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
  • MiniMax M1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mercury 2 and MiniMax M1 specifications
Mercury 2MiniMax M1
ProviderInceptionMiniMax
Noometry Index38.839.7
Released2026-02-202025-06-13
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window128K1M
Max output50K40K
Input $ / M tokens$0.25$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$0.75$2.20
Results tracked1718

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax M1 leads

Mercury 2: 33.2 (#250), MiniMax M1: 39.2 (#149)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2MiniMax M1
LMArena Coding13911359
LMArena WebDev1170—
SciCode38.7%—
WeirdML43.2%—
ALE-Bench785.58—

Reasoning MiniMax M1 leads

Mercury 2: 23.0 (#170), MiniMax M1: 25.8 (#125)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2MiniMax M1
LMArena Hard Prompts13621340
CritPt0.8%—

Math Not comparable

Mercury 2: —, MiniMax M1: 34.8 (#152)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2MiniMax M1
LMArena Math—1360

Knowledge Too close to call

Mercury 2: 35.6 (#170), MiniMax M1: 35.7 (#168)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2MiniMax M1
LMArena Expert13581316
Vectara Hallucination Rate12.3%—

Multilingual Too close to call

Mercury 2: 46.8 (#153), MiniMax M1: 46.0 (#157)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2MiniMax M1
LMArena Non-English13311320
LMArena Chinese14161361
LMArena Russian13031330
LMArena French—1369
LMArena German—1350
LMArena Japanese—1220
LMArena Korean—1263
LMArena Spanish—1354

Instruction Following Too close to call

Mercury 2: 70.4 (#161), MiniMax M1: 69.5 (#169)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2MiniMax M1
LMArena Instruction Following13281312

Long Context Too close to call

Mercury 2: 40.4 (#149), MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#136)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2MiniMax M1
LMArena Longer Query13291326
Fiction.LiveBench—69.4%

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Mercury 2: 54.0 (#151), MiniMax M1: 53.3 (#155)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2MiniMax M1
LMArena Text13551343
LMArena Creative Writing12891298
LMArena Multi-Turn13581335

Frequently asked questions

Is Mercury 2 better than MiniMax M1?

Mercury 2 and MiniMax M1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.8 vs 39.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Mercury 2 or MiniMax M1?

Mercury 2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.75 per million output tokens; MiniMax M1 lists at $0.40 and $2.20.

Is Mercury 2 or MiniMax M1 better for coding?

MiniMax M1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.2 versus 33.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax M1 does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Mercury 2 and MiniMax M1 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury 2 has 17 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper