Model comparison

Mercury 2.5 vs StarCoder 2 7B

Neither Mercury 2.5 nor StarCoder 2 7B has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Mercury 2.5 Inception

30.2

Unranked Sparse

StarCoder 2 7B NVIDIA

36.5

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • StarCoder 2 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mercury 2.5 and StarCoder 2 7B specifications
Mercury 2.5StarCoder 2 7B
ProviderInceptionNVIDIA
Noometry Index30.236.5
Released2026-09-082024-02-20
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window260K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.04—
Output $ / M tokens$0.15—
Results tracked27

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mercury 2.5: —, StarCoder 2 7B: 34.2

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2.5StarCoder 2 7B
BigCodeBench Complete—27.7%
ALE-Bench301.65—
HumanEval+—29.9%

Reasoning Not comparable

Mercury 2.5: —, StarCoder 2 7B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2.5StarCoder 2 7B
Epoch Capabilities Index—92.92
WinoGrande—57.1%

Math Not comparable

Mercury 2.5: 22.4, StarCoder 2 7B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2.5StarCoder 2 7B
ProofBench3%—
GSM8K—32.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Mercury 2.5: —, StarCoder 2 7B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2.5StarCoder 2 7B
ARC (AI2) Challenge—38.7%
MMLU—38.8%

Frequently asked questions

Is Mercury 2.5 better than StarCoder 2 7B?

Neither Mercury 2.5 nor StarCoder 2 7B has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.

How many benchmarks do Mercury 2.5 and StarCoder 2 7B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury 2.5 has 2 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 7B has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper