Model comparison
Mercury 2.5 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#152); Mercury 2.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 37.3 to 22.4.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.04 / $0.15 for Mercury 2.5.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 260K.
Side by side
| Mercury 2.5 | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.2 | 39.5 |
| Released | 2026-09-08 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 260K | 1M |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.04 | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 2 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mercury 2.5: —, Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ALE-Bench | 301.65 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Mercury 2.5: —, Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)
| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.62 |
Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Mercury 2.5: 22.4, Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)
| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| ProofBench | 3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mercury 2.5: —, Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)
| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mercury 2.5 better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#152); Mercury 2.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Which is cheaper, Mercury 2.5 or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Mercury 2.5 lists at $0.04 and $0.15.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 260K.
How many benchmarks do Mercury 2.5 and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury 2.5 has 2 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.