Model comparison
Mercury 2.5 vs Phi-3.5-MoE
Mercury 2.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#242); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- Phi-3.5-MoE has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mercury 2.5 | Phi-3.5-MoE | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 33.5 | — |
| Released | 2026-09-08 | 2024-08-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 260K | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.04 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Results tracked | 4 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mercury 2.5: 39.5 (#156), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
Reasoning Not comparable
Mercury 2.5: 22.4 (#193), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
Math Not comparable
Mercury 2.5: 23.3 (#272), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 3% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 88.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mercury 2.5: —, Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| BoolQ | — | 84.6% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mercury 2.5 better than Phi-3.5-MoE?
Mercury 2.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#242); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Mercury 2.5 and Phi-3.5-MoE share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury 2.5 has 4 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-MoE has 3.