Model comparison
Mercury 2.5 vs Phi-1.5
Neither Mercury 2.5 nor Phi-1.5 has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- Phi-1.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mercury 2.5 | Phi-1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 30.2 | — |
| Released | 2026-09-08 | 2023-09-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 260K | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.04 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Results tracked | 2 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mercury 2.5: —, Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ALE-Bench | 301.65 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Mercury 2.5: —, Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 90.82 |
| HellaSwag | — | 47.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73.4% |
Math Not comparable
Mercury 2.5: 22.4, Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mercury 2.5: —, Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 44.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 75.8% |
| MMLU | — | 37.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 37.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mercury 2.5 better than Phi-1.5?
Neither Mercury 2.5 nor Phi-1.5 has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.
How many benchmarks do Mercury 2.5 and Phi-1.5 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury 2.5 has 2 scored results on Noometry and Phi-1.5 has 7.