Model comparison

Mercury 2.5 vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Mercury 2.5 Inception

33.5

Rank #242 Reported

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury 2.5 scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Muse Spark leads 47.8 to 23.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 3% for Mercury 2.5 and 17% for Muse Spark.

Side by side

Mercury 2.5 and Muse Spark specifications
Mercury 2.5Muse Spark
ProviderInceptionMeta
Noometry Index33.550.6
Released2026-09-082026-04-08
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window260K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.04—
Output $ / M tokens$0.15—
Results tracked427

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Mercury 2.5: 39.5 (#156), Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Muse Spark
SciCode38.5%51.5%
LMArena Coding—1481
ALE-Bench301.65—

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Mercury 2.5: 22.4 (#193), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Muse Spark
CritPt0%11.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1474
Epoch Capabilities Index—152.04

Math Muse Spark leads

Mercury 2.5: 23.3 (#272), Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Muse Spark
ProofBench3%17%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
LMArena Math—1455
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Not comparable

Mercury 2.5: —, Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Muse Spark
GPQA Diamond—89.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%
LMArena Expert—1457

Multimodal Not comparable

Mercury 2.5: —, Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Muse Spark
LMArena Vision—1306
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Not comparable

Mercury 2.5: —, Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Muse Spark
LMArena Non-English—1464
LMArena Chinese—1509
LMArena French—1497
LMArena German—1497
LMArena Korean—1459
LMArena Russian—1466
LMArena Spanish—1472

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mercury 2.5: —, Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Muse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following—1442

Long Context Not comparable

Mercury 2.5: —, Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Muse Spark
LMArena Longer Query—1451

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Mercury 2.5: —, Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Muse Spark
LMArena Text—1474
LMArena Creative Writing—1459
LMArena Multi-Turn—1477

Frequently asked questions

Is Mercury 2.5 better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mercury 2.5 or Muse Spark better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mercury 2.5 and Muse Spark share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury 2.5 has 4 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper