Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 vs Magistral Small

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Small Mistral AI

29.9

Rank #289 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads 27.9 to 6.9.
  • Magistral Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and Magistral Small specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Magistral Small
ProviderAmazonMistral AI
Noometry Index42.429.9
Released—2025-06-10
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—40K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$1.50
Results tracked1710

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 41.6 (#109), Magistral Small: 37.8 (#172)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Magistral Small
SciCode—35.2%
LMArena Coding1433—

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 27.9 (#94), Magistral Small: 6.9 (#345)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Magistral Small
ARC-AGI-2—0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—6.3%
ARC-AGI-1—5%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1422—
DTBench—61.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—133.19

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 36.4 (#116), Magistral Small: 24.9 (#253)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Magistral Small
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—30%
LMArena Math1431—

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.3 (#122), Magistral Small: 30.9 (#215)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Magistral Small
GPQA Diamond—56.1%
LMArena Expert1432—

Multilingual Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 52.1 (#91), Magistral Small: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Magistral Small
LMArena Non-English1405—
LMArena Chinese1463—
LMArena French1449—
LMArena German1396—
LMArena Japanese1383—
LMArena Korean1387—
LMArena Russian1395—
LMArena Spanish1444—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 73.4 (#118), Magistral Small: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Magistral Small
LMArena Instruction Following1387—

Long Context Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.5 (#116), Magistral Small: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Magistral Small
LMArena Longer Query1395—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 59.0 (#109), Magistral Small: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Magistral Small
LMArena Text1415—
LMArena Creative Writing1349—
LMArena Multi-Turn1380—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 better than Magistral Small?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 or Magistral Small better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and Magistral Small share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Small has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper