Model comparison
Magistral Medium vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 28.2 to 8.6.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $5 for Magistral Medium.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Magistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Magistral Medium | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.2 | 39.9 |
| Released | 2025-03-17 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 16K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $5 | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 22 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 39.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 16.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 6.1% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1267 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.64 |
Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1250 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1232 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1227 | — |
| LMArena French | 1267 | — |
| LMArena German | 1248 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1224 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1271 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1254 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1295 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1255 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1245 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Magistral Medium better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Magistral Medium or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Magistral Medium lists at $2 and $5.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.