Model comparison

Grok 3 vs Magistral Medium

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Grok 3 xAI

39.9

Rank #157 Confirmed

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

35.2

Rank #227 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 7 categories and Magistral Medium in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Grok 3 leads 52.3 to 39.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 61.3% for Grok 3 and 16.2% for Magistral Medium.
  • Magistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 3 and Magistral Medium specifications
Grok 3Magistral Medium
ProviderxAIMistral AI
Noometry Index39.935.2
Released2025-04-092025-03-17
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$5
Results tracked4022

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 41.9 (#115), Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Magistral Medium
LMArena Coding14321319
Aider Polyglot53.3%—
SciCode—39.2%
WeirdML37.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 3: 30.5 (#76), Magistral Medium: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Magistral Medium
BALROG29.5%—

Reasoning Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 13.7 (#333), Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Magistral Medium
ARC-AGI-20%0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%16.2%
ARC-AGI-15.5%6.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts14341267
SimpleBench36.1%—
CritPt—0.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index138.33—

Math Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 38.0 (#145), Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Magistral Medium
LMArena Math13911250
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202555.6%—
Omni-MATH46.4%—
MATH Level 588.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)3.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 46.2 (#82), Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Magistral Medium
LMArena Expert14211223
GPQA Diamond75.8%—
MMLU-Pro78.8%—
Confabulations14.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.8%—
GPQA (HELM)65%—

Multilingual Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 52.3 (#87), Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Magistral Medium
LMArena Non-English14101232
LMArena Chinese14481227
LMArena French14601267
LMArena German14311248
LMArena Japanese13871175
LMArena Korean13731125
LMArena Russian14161224
LMArena Spanish14171271

Instruction Following Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 75.0 (#73), Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Magistral Medium
LMArena Instruction Following14091254
IFEval88.4%—

Long Context Too close to call

Grok 3: 38.7 (#192), Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Magistral Medium
LMArena Longer Query14391295
Fiction.LiveBench58.3%—

Writing & Preference Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 55.8 (#141), Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Magistral Medium
LMArena Text14261255
LMArena Creative Writing14141245
LMArena Multi-Turn14251275
Short-Story Creative Writing76.4%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1186—
WildBench84.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 3 better than Magistral Medium?

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 3 or Magistral Medium better for coding?

Grok 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 39.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and Magistral Medium share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper