Model comparison

Magistral Medium vs Qwen3 235B-A22B

Qwen3 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

35.2

Rank #227 Confirmed

Qwen3 235B-A22B Alibaba (Qwen)

43.5

Rank #91 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Medium scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 235B-A22B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 235B-A22B leads 49.6 to 33.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 16.2% for Magistral Medium and 69.4% for Qwen3 235B-A22B.
  • Qwen3 235B-A22B is cheaper at $0.70 / $2.80 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $5 for Magistral Medium.
  • Magistral Medium accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

Magistral Medium and Qwen3 235B-A22B specifications
Magistral MediumQwen3 235B-A22B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index35.243.5
Released2025-03-172025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K131K
Max output16K16K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.70
Output $ / M tokens$5$2.80
Results tracked2249

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 44.3 (#75)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3 235B-A22B
SciCode39.2%42.4%
LMArena Coding13191445
Aider Polyglot—59.6%
WeirdML—41%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Magistral Medium: —, Qwen3 235B-A22B: 33.9 (#51)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3 235B-A22B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—52.1%
Vending-Bench 2—-11.34

Reasoning Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 15.7 (#311)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3 235B-A22B
ARC-AGI-20%1.3%
Kagi LLM Benchmark16.2%69.4%
ARC-AGI-16.1%11%
CritPt0.3%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts12671433
SimpleBench—31%
Chess Puzzles—12%
Mystery Game Puzzles—9%
DTBench—80.3%
LMCA—29.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—143.85
ForecastBench—59.7

Math Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 50.4 (#57)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Math12501432
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
Omni-MATH—71.8%
MATH Level 5—68.9%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—8.5%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 49.6 (#73)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Expert12231463
GPQA Diamond—80.1%
SimpleQA Verified—40.4%
MMLU-Pro—84.4%
Confabulations—15.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
GPQA (HELM)—72.7%

Multilingual Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 52.3 (#89)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Non-English12321409
LMArena Chinese12271481
LMArena French12671445
LMArena German12481433
LMArena Japanese11751399
LMArena Korean11251391
LMArena Russian12241411
LMArena Spanish12711430

Instruction Following Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 72.6 (#136)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Instruction Following12541408
IFEval—83.5%

Long Context Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 46.1 (#26)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Longer Query12951426
Fiction.LiveBench—75%

Writing & Preference Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 59.6 (#108)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Text12551419
LMArena Creative Writing12451384
LMArena Multi-Turn12751432
Short-Story Creative Writing—83%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1366
WildBench—86.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Medium better than Qwen3 235B-A22B?

Qwen3 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Magistral Medium or Qwen3 235B-A22B?

Qwen3 235B-A22B is cheaper. It lists at $0.70 per million input tokens and $2.80 per million output tokens; Magistral Medium lists at $2 and $5.

Is Magistral Medium or Qwen3 235B-A22B better for coding?

Qwen3 235B-A22B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 39.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Magistral Medium does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and Qwen3 235B-A22B share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 235B-A22B has 49.

Related comparisons

Go deeper