Model comparison
Gemma 4 31B IT vs Magistral Medium
Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher in 8 categories and Magistral Medium in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemma 4 31B IT leads 27.2 to 8.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 63.5% for Gemma 4 31B IT and 16.2% for Magistral Medium.
- Gemma 4 31B IT is cheaper at $0.09 / $0.34 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $5 for Magistral Medium.
Side by side
| Gemma 4 31B IT | Magistral Medium | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 43.5 | 35.2 |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | 2025-03-17 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 33K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.09 | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.34 | $5 |
| Results tracked | 35 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 42.3 (#108), Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 43.4% | 39.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1459 | 1319 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1366 | — |
| WeirdML | 52.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 925.5 | — |
Reasoning Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 27.2 (#122), Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 63.5% | 16.2% |
| CritPt | 1.4% | 0.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1448 | 1267 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 70.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 6.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 53% | — |
| DTBench | 82.7% | — |
| LMCA | 39.3% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 30.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.74 | — |
Math Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 43.2 (#81), Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1465 | 1250 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 73.3% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#151), Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1465 | 1223 |
| GPQA Diamond | 75.8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 10.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.6 (#34), Magistral Medium: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1277 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1425 | — |
Multilingual Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 53.8 (#57), Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1431 | 1232 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | 1227 |
| LMArena French | 1435 | 1267 |
| LMArena Russian | 1460 | 1224 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1444 | 1271 |
| LMArena German | — | 1248 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1175 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1125 |
Instruction Following Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.5 (#61), Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1433 | 1254 |
Long Context Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#71), Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1446 | 1295 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.5 (#96), Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1443 | 1255 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1415 | 1245 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1452 | 1275 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1368 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1120 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 4 31B IT better than Magistral Medium?
Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 31B IT or Magistral Medium?
Gemma 4 31B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.09 per million input tokens and $0.34 per million output tokens; Magistral Medium lists at $2 and $5.
Is Gemma 4 31B IT or Magistral Medium better for coding?
Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 39.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 262K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 31B IT and Magistral Medium share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 31B IT has 35 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.