Model comparison

Magistral Medium vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

34.8

Rank #224 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.1

Rank #303 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Medium scores higher in 7 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Magistral Medium leads 46.5 to 27.3.

Side by side

Magistral Medium and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
Magistral MediumPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderMistral AIMicrosoft
Noometry Index34.829.1
Released2025-03-172024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$5—
Results tracked2219

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 38.6 (#161), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.3 (#307)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Coding13191040
SciCode39.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%

Reasoning Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Magistral Medium: 8.7 (#342), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 18.7 (#254)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12671028
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark16.2%—
ARC-AGI-16.1%—
CritPt0.3%—

Math Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 32.4 (#187), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 29.2 (#220)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math12491089

Knowledge Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 32.9 (#199), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.3 (#251)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert1222984

Multilingual Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 39.8 (#219), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.4 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English12321000
LMArena Chinese12251016
LMArena French12681038
LMArena German12481006
LMArena Japanese1176899
LMArena Korean1125856
LMArena Russian12241004
LMArena Spanish12691058

Instruction Following Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 66.2 (#207), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 52.1 (#289)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12541023

Long Context Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#178), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.3 (#284)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1295996

Writing & Preference Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 46.5 (#214), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.3 (#296)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text12551050
LMArena Creative Writing12451024
LMArena Multi-Turn1275989

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Medium better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Magistral Medium or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

Magistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper