Model comparison

Magistral Medium vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

35.2

Rank #227 Confirmed

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Medium scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 33.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 39.2% for Magistral Medium and 51.5% for Muse Spark.
  • Magistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Magistral Medium and Muse Spark specifications
Magistral MediumMuse Spark
ProviderMistral AIMeta
Noometry Index35.250.6
Released2025-03-172026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$5—
Results tracked2227

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161), Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMuse Spark
SciCode39.2%51.5%
LMArena Coding13191481

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMuse Spark
CritPt0.3%11.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts12671474
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark16.2%—
ARC-AGI-16.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—152.04

Math Muse Spark leads

Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189), Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMuse Spark
LMArena Math12501455
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
ProofBench—17%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202), Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMuse Spark
LMArena Expert12231457
GPQA Diamond—89.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Magistral Medium: —, Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMuse Spark
LMArena Vision—1306
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224), Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMuse Spark
LMArena Non-English12321464
LMArena Chinese12271509
LMArena French12671497
LMArena German12481497
LMArena Korean11251459
LMArena Russian12241466
LMArena Spanish12711472
LMArena Japanese1175—

Instruction Following Muse Spark leads

Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211), Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMuse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following12541442

Long Context Muse Spark leads

Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183), Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMuse Spark
LMArena Longer Query12951451

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219), Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMuse Spark
LMArena Text12551474
LMArena Creative Writing12451459
LMArena Multi-Turn12751477

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Medium better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Magistral Medium or Muse Spark better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 39.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and Muse Spark share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper