Model comparison
Muse Spark vs Qwen3 14B
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen3 14B in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 39.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 89.8% for Muse Spark and 63.8% for Qwen3 14B.
- Qwen3 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Muse Spark | Qwen3 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 50.6 | 35.5 |
| Released | 2026-04-08 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 51.5% | 31.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1481 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Muse Spark: —, Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |
Reasoning Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 11.3% | 0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.04 | 138.23 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1474 | — |
| DTBench | — | 64% |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |
Math Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | 66.4% |
| ProofBench | 17% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1455 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.8% | 63.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 40.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1457 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1464 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1509 | — |
| LMArena French | 1497 | — |
| LMArena German | 1497 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1466 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1442 | — |
Long Context Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1451 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1474 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Spark better than Qwen3 14B?
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Spark or Qwen3 14B better for coding?
Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 37.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Qwen3 14B share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.