Model comparison
Longcat Flash Chat vs Qwen-14B
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Longcat Flash Chat scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen-14B in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 61.0 to 27.6.
Side by side
| Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meituan | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | 2023-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1471 | 1071 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1440 | 1027 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 43.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 17.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.03 |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |
Math Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | 1068 |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1454 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |
Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101), Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1077 |
| LMArena French | 1456 | — |
| LMArena German | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1371 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1445 | — |
Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96), Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1411 | 1031 |
Long Context Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1425 | 1028 |
Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91), Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1418 | 1022 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Longcat Flash Chat better than Qwen-14B?
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Longcat Flash Chat or Qwen-14B better for coding?
Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and Qwen-14B share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.