Model comparison
Longcat Flash Chat vs Qwen1.5-7B
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Longcat Flash Chat scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen1.5-7B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 61.0 to 29.6.
Side by side
| Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen1.5-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meituan | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87), Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1471 | 1107 |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-7B leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272), Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1440 | 1065 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 43.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 17.7% | — |
Math Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107), Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | 1080 |
Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1454 | 1055 |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |
Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1006 |
| LMArena French | 1456 | — |
| LMArena German | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1371 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1445 | — |
Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96), Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1411 | 1058 |
Long Context Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93), Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1425 | 1090 |
Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91), Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | 1083 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1035 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1418 | 1062 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Longcat Flash Chat better than Qwen1.5-7B?
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Longcat Flash Chat or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?
Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and Qwen1.5-7B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.