Model comparison
Longcat Flash Chat vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Longcat Flash Chat scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 61.0 to 46.2.
Side by side
| Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meituan | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 37.9 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1471 | 1291 |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1440 | 1272 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 43.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 17.7% | — |
Math Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | 1305 |
Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1454 | 1295 |
Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | 1456 | 1260 |
| LMArena German | 1408 | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1445 | 1289 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1371 | — |
Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1411 | 1247 |
Long Context Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1425 | 1272 |
Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1418 | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Longcat Flash Chat better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Longcat Flash Chat or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?
Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.