Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads 49.5 to 38.1.
  • Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Olmo 3.1 32b Think
ProviderAmazonAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index42.137.9
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1715

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.6 (#123), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Coding14121291

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 28.4 (#106), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Hard Prompts13961272

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 39.0 (#119), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Math14251305

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 38.5 (#144), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Expert13861295

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.5 (#131), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Non-English13721209
LMArena Chinese14041242
LMArena French14251260
LMArena German13911262
LMArena Russian13711193
LMArena Spanish13821289
LMArena Japanese1360—
LMArena Korean1324—

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.1 (#141), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Instruction Following13651247

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#133), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Longer Query13701272

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.6 (#136), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Text13941272
LMArena Creative Writing13181226
LMArena Multi-Turn13641252

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper