Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads 49.7 to 42.8.
  • Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
ProviderAmazonAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index41.538.8
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1716

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.0 (#123), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding14131346

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 27.3 (#110), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13961322

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 36.2 (#121), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Math14251305

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 37.8 (#142), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Expert13851307

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.7 (#127), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13721275
LMArena Chinese14051304
LMArena French14261328
LMArena German13911283
LMArena Korean13271206
LMArena Russian13711268
LMArena Spanish13811337
LMArena Japanese1355—

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.3 (#136), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13651298

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#128), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13701312

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.9 (#131), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Text13941311
LMArena Creative Writing13181264
LMArena Multi-Turn13641309

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper