Model comparison
Longcat Flash Chat vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Longcat Flash Chat scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 40.6 to 19.5.
Side by side
| Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meituan | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 32.7 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1471 | 1210 |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1440 | 1208 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 43.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 17.7% | — |
Math Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | 1208 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1454 | — |
Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1456 | — |
| LMArena German | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1371 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1445 | — |
Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1411 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |
Long Context Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1425 | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1418 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Longcat Flash Chat better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Longcat Flash Chat or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.