Model comparison

Longcat Flash Chat vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Longcat Flash Chat scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 40.6 to 19.5.

Side by side

Longcat Flash Chat and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
Longcat Flash ChatOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderMeituanAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index42.132.7
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1916

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding14711210

Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14401208
Kagi LLM Benchmark43.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)17.7%—

Math Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math14421208
Omni-MATH—16.1%

Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1454—

Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14041160
LMArena Chinese14651192
LMArena Russian13951187
LMArena French1456—
LMArena German1408—
LMArena Japanese1373—
LMArena Korean1371—
LMArena Spanish1445—

Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14111186
IFEval—78%

Long Context Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14251194

Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text14271218
LMArena Creative Writing13881199
LMArena Multi-Turn14181221
WildBench—73.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Longcat Flash Chat better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Longcat Flash Chat or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper