Model comparison

gpt-oss-20b vs Longcat Flash Chat

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

gpt-oss-20b OpenAI

32.5

Rank #255 Confirmed

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. gpt-oss-20b scores higher in 2 categories and Longcat Flash Chat in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 61.0 to 35.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 53.2% for gpt-oss-20b and 43.9% for Longcat Flash Chat.

Side by side

gpt-oss-20b and Longcat Flash Chat specifications
gpt-oss-20bLongcat Flash Chat
ProviderOpenAIMeituan
Noometry Index32.542.1
Released2025-08-05—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.018—
Output $ / M tokens$0.09—
Results tracked3419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads

gpt-oss-20b: 37.6 (#192), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Coding13061471
SciCode34.4%—
WeirdML40.9%—
ALE-Bench566.05—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

gpt-oss-20b: 9.3 (#154), Longcat Flash Chat: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bLongcat Flash Chat
Terminal-Bench3.4%—

Reasoning Too close to call

gpt-oss-20b: 19.3 (#261), Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bLongcat Flash Chat
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.2%43.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts12741440
NYT Connections (extended)—17.7%
CritPt1.4%—
Chess Puzzles4%—
DTBench68%—
LMCA14.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index137.82—

Math Too close to call

gpt-oss-20b: 39.4 (#103), Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Math13171442
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202565.3%—
Omni-MATH56.5%—

Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads

gpt-oss-20b: 34.6 (#195), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Expert12581454
GPQA Diamond60.8%—
MMLU-Pro74%—
GPQA (HELM)59.4%—

Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads

gpt-oss-20b: 42.2 (#197), Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Non-English12681404
LMArena Chinese13141465
LMArena German12551408
LMArena Japanese12441373
LMArena Korean12361371
LMArena Russian12781395
LMArena Spanish12671445
LMArena French—1456

Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads

gpt-oss-20b: 61.8 (#240), Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Instruction Following12361411
IFEval73.2%—

Long Context Longcat Flash Chat leads

gpt-oss-20b: 37.9 (#209), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Longer Query12501425

Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads

gpt-oss-20b: 35.5 (#265), Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Text12871427
LMArena Creative Writing12011388
LMArena Multi-Turn12681418
EQ-Bench Creative Writing666—
WildBench73.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is gpt-oss-20b better than Longcat Flash Chat?

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is gpt-oss-20b or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do gpt-oss-20b and Longcat Flash Chat share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. gpt-oss-20b has 34 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper