Model comparison

Longcat Flash Chat vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Longcat Flash Chat scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 43.1 to 19.0.

Side by side

Longcat Flash Chat and MiMo-V2.6-Pro specifications
Longcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderMeituanXiaomi
Noometry Index42.150.3
Released—2026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.43
Output $ / M tokens—$0.87
Results tracked1919

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Coding14711534
LMArena WebDev—1629
SciCode—60.9%
ALE-Bench—1,158

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.6-Pro
APEX-Agents—59.5%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts14401512
Kagi LLM Benchmark43.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)17.7%—
CritPt—26.6%

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Math14421494
ProofBench—70%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Expert14541543

Multimodal Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision—1264

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Non-English14041474
LMArena Chinese14651529
LMArena Russian13951480
LMArena French1456—
LMArena German1408—
LMArena Japanese1373—
LMArena Korean1371—
LMArena Spanish1445—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following14111493

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Longer Query14251501

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text14271492
LMArena Creative Writing13881468
LMArena Multi-Turn14181464

Frequently asked questions

Is Longcat Flash Chat better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Longcat Flash Chat or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 43.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper