Model comparison
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs Qwen3.5 Plus
Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 47.9 to 28.8.
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen3.5 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.2 | 42.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-02-16 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.40 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.3 (#295), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1025 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 19.1 (#245), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.0 (#67)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1047 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.79 |
Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#223), Qwen3.5 Plus: 47.9 (#55)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1072 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#78)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.9 (#265), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1064 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.5 (#274), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1061 | — |
Long Context Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#283), Qwen3.5 Plus: 42.9 (#109)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 998 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.8 (#278), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1098 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1058 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than Qwen3.5 Plus?
Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Qwen3.5 Plus share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.