Model comparison
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has enough public results to be ranked (#265); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.2 | — |
| Released | — | 2024-09-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.3 (#295), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1025 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 19.1 (#245), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1047 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.93 |
| HellaSwag | — | 76.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.9% |
Math Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#223), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1072 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.9% |
| MMLU | — | 68% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.9 (#265), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1064 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.5 (#274), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1061 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#283), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 998 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.8 (#278), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1098 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1058 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has enough public results to be ranked (#265); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.