Model comparison

o1-pro vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)

o1-pro has enough public results to be ranked (#271); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

o1-pro OpenAI

31.5

Rank #271 Reported

Summary

  • Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

o1-pro and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) specifications
o1-proQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.5—
Released2025-03-192024-09-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output100K—
Input $ / M tokens$150—
Output $ / M tokens$600—
Results tracked36

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Reasoning Not comparable

o1-pro: 20.4 (#239), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarko1-proQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
ARC-AGI-123.3%—
EnigmaEval6.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—113.14
HellaSwag—76.8%
WinoGrande—72.9%

Math Not comparable

o1-pro: —, Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Math benchmarks
Benchmarko1-proQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
GSM8K—86.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

o1-pro: 29.7 (#234), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarko1-proQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Humanity's Last Exam8.1%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—60.9%
MMLU—68%

Frequently asked questions

Is o1-pro better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?

o1-pro has enough public results to be ranked (#271); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do o1-pro and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-pro has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper