Model comparison
o1-pro vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
o1-pro has enough public results to be ranked (#271); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| o1-pro | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.5 | — |
| Released | 2025-03-19 | 2024-09-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 100K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $150 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $600 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Reasoning Not comparable
o1-pro: 20.4 (#239), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1 | 23.3% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 6.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.14 |
| HellaSwag | — | 76.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.9% |
Math Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | — | 86.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
o1-pro: 29.7 (#234), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.1% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.9% |
| MMLU | — | 68% |
Frequently asked questions
Is o1-pro better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?
o1-pro has enough public results to be ranked (#271); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do o1-pro and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-pro has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.