Model comparison
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 49.1 to 31.6.
Side by side
| Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 38.7 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1025 | 1319 |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1047 | 1302 |
Math Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1072 | 1316 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1273 |
Multilingual Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1063 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1254 |
Instruction Following Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1060 | 1275 |
Long Context Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 998 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1098 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1058 | 1290 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.