Model comparison
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
MetaSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer leads 57.5 to 31.6.
Side by side
| Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 41.7 |
| Released | — | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1025 | 1416 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1047 | 1396 |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1072 | 1417 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1386 |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1063 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1390 |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1060 | 1375 |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 998 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1098 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1058 | 1399 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Muse Glimmer share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.