Model comparison
Granite 4.2 30b vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 6 categories and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 53.8 to 31.6.
Side by side
| Granite 4.2 30b | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 31.8 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 11 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1396 | 1025 |
Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1047 |
Math Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1072 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1406 | — |
Multilingual Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1063 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1414 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1343 | — |
Instruction Following Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | 1060 |
Long Context Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1359 | 998 |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1361 | 1098 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1058 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?
Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.2 30b or Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better for coding?
Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.