Model comparison

Llama 4 Scout vs Olmo 7b Instruct

Olmo 7b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.3 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Llama 4 Scout Meta

27.7

Rank #330 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 4 Scout scores higher in 3 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Llama 4 Scout leads 41.0 to 24.0.

Side by side

Llama 4 Scout and Olmo 7b Instruct specifications
Llama 4 ScoutOlmo 7b Instruct
ProviderMetaAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index27.730.3
Released2025-04-05—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.30—
Results tracked4310

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 7b Instruct leads

Llama 4 Scout: 20.2 (#339), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Coding12861016
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)9.1%—
SciCode17%—
BigCodeBench Complete43.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 4 Scout: 24.6 (#119), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutOlmo 7b Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard28.1%—

Reasoning Olmo 7b Instruct leads

Llama 4 Scout: 9.1 (#345), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts1266993
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark36.9%—
ARC-AGI-10.5%—
CritPt0%—
DTBench57.9%—
LMCA12%—
Epoch Capabilities Index129.64—
ForecastBench57.5—

Math Olmo 7b Instruct leads

Llama 4 Scout: 19.6 (#286), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Math12871018
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20257.8%—
Omni-MATH37.3%—
MATH Level 562.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 4 Scout: 31.9 (#217), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutOlmo 7b Instruct
GPQA Diamond51.8%—
MMLU-Pro74.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.7%—
GPQA (HELM)50.7%—
LMArena Expert1235—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 4 Scout: 32.2 (#102), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Vision1118—
SpatialViz-Bench34.2%—

Multilingual Llama 4 Scout leads

Llama 4 Scout: 41.0 (#212), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Non-English1252977
LMArena Chinese12551014
LMArena Russian1263947
LMArena French1282—
LMArena German1272—
LMArena Japanese1206—
LMArena Korean1207—
LMArena Spanish1278—

Instruction Following Llama 4 Scout leads

Llama 4 Scout: 65.8 (#217), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1248978
IFEval81.8%—

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#294), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutOlmo 7b Instruct
Fiction.LiveBench36%—
LMArena Longer Query1265—

Writing & Preference Llama 4 Scout leads

Llama 4 Scout: 37.0 (#261), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Text12791032
LMArena Creative Writing1249990
LMArena Multi-Turn12801007
EQ-Bench Creative Writing783—
WildBench78%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 4 Scout better than Olmo 7b Instruct?

Olmo 7b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.3 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 4 Scout or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 7b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.6 versus 20.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 4 Scout and Olmo 7b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 4 Scout has 43 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper