Model comparison

Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)

Llama 4 Maverick has enough public results to be ranked (#276); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Llama 4 Maverick Meta

30.6

Rank #276 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.

Side by side

Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) specifications
Llama 4 MaverickQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.6—
Released2025-04-052024-09-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.19—
Output $ / M tokens$0.65—
Results tracked546

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Llama 4 Maverick: 26.3 (#318), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)21%—
Aider Polyglot15.6%—
SciCode33.1%—
WeirdML24.5%—
BigCodeBench Instruct49.7%—
LMArena Coding1302—
BigCodeBench Complete61.4%—
ALE-Bench172.97—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 4 Maverick: 27.9 (#86), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard37.3%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Llama 4 Maverick: 10.1 (#337), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Epoch Capabilities Index132.2112.93
ARC-AGI-20%—
SimpleBench27.7%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark55.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)8%—
ARC-AGI-14.4%—
CritPt0%—
EnigmaEval0.6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1281—
DTBench61.9%—
LMCA15.9%—
ForecastBench57.5—
HellaSwag—76.8%
WinoGrande—72.9%

Math Not comparable

Llama 4 Maverick: 24.6 (#256), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202520.6%—
Omni-MATH42.2%—
LMArena Math1299—
MATH Level 573%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.7%—
GSM8K—86.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 4 Maverick: 33.3 (#196), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
GPQA Diamond67%—
Humanity's Last Exam5.7%—
MMLU-Pro81%—
Confabulations22.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.2%—
GPQA (HELM)65%—
LMArena Expert1259—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—60.9%
MMLU—68%

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 4 Maverick: 30.9 (#100), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Vision1141—
GeoBench52%—
SpatialViz-Bench31.8%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 4 Maverick: 42.4 (#190), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Non-English1269—
LMArena Chinese1277—
LMArena French1258—
LMArena German1291—
LMArena Japanese1207—
LMArena Korean1203—
LMArena Russian1286—
LMArena Spanish1293—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama 4 Maverick: 71.9 (#140), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
IFEval90.8%—
LMArena Instruction Following1267—

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 4 Maverick: 31.4 (#274), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Fiction.LiveBench46.2%—
LMArena Longer Query1280—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Llama 4 Maverick: 39.0 (#247), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Text1287—
LMArena Creative Writing1266—
Short-Story Creative Writing62%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing860—
WildBench80%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1289—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 4 Maverick better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?

Llama 4 Maverick has enough public results to be ranked (#276); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Llama 4 Maverick has 54 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper