Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Gemma 1.1 7b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#277); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 31.3 | — |
| Released | — | 2024-09-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1084 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 35.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 45% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1071 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.14 |
| HellaSwag | — | 76.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.9% |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1107 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.9% |
| MMLU | — | 68% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1052 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | — |
| LMArena French | 1065 | — |
| LMArena German | 1054 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 971 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 988 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1049 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1057 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1056 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1094 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1060 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1040 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?
Gemma 1.1 7b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#277); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.