Model comparison

Llama 3-8B vs Qwen3-4B

Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.5

Rank #344 Confirmed

Qwen3-4B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.9

Rank #264 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-8B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-4B in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-4B leads 33.0 to 7.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.9% for Llama 3-8B and 52.2% for Qwen3-4B.

Side by side

Llama 3-8B and Qwen3-4B specifications
Llama 3-8BQwen3-4B
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index25.531.9
Released2024-04-182025-04-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked346

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289), Qwen3-4B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3-4B
BigCodeBench Instruct31.9%—
LMArena Coding1152—
BigCodeBench Complete36.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+54.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3-8B: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3-4B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—35.7%

Reasoning Qwen3-4B leads

Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326), Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3-4B
Chess Puzzles0%4%
LMArena Hard Prompts1133—
DTBench43.9%—
Adversarial NLI57.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index116.45—
ForecastBench58.6—
WinoGrande75.7%—

Math Qwen3-4B leads

Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323), Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3-4B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%52.2%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—38.5%
LMArena Math1151—
MATH Level 56.1%—

Knowledge Qwen3-4B leads

Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3-4B
GPQA Diamond26.1%52.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.7%
LMArena Expert1113—
ARC (AI2) Challenge82.8%—
MMLU68.8%—
OpenBookQA82.6%—
TriviaQA67.7%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261), Qwen3-4B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3-4B
LMArena Non-English1098—
LMArena Chinese1076—
LMArena French1159—
LMArena German1104—
LMArena Japanese967—
LMArena Korean1004—
LMArena Russian1109—
LMArena Spanish1173—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260), Qwen3-4B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3-4B
LMArena Instruction Following1127—

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251), Qwen3-4B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3-4B
LMArena Longer Query1128—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256), Qwen3-4B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3-4B
LMArena Text1166—
LMArena Creative Writing1150—
LMArena Multi-Turn1152—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3-8B better than Qwen3-4B?

Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3-8B and Qwen3-4B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-8B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper