Model comparison

Gemma 3 12B vs Llama 3-8B

Gemma 3 12B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 12B Google

32.1

Rank #262 Confirmed

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.5

Rank #344 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 12B scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3-8B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 3 12B leads 26.5 to 7.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 16.7% for Gemma 3 12B and 1.9% for Llama 3-8B.

Side by side

Gemma 3 12B and Llama 3-8B specifications
Gemma 3 12BLlama 3-8B
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index32.125.5
Released2025-03-122024-04-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.05—
Output $ / M tokens$0.15—
Results tracked2434

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Gemma 3 12B: 31.7 (#280), Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 3-8B
LMArena Coding12811152
SciCode17.4%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—31.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—36.9%
HumanEval+—56.7%
MBPP+—54.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: 25.5 (#108), Llama 3-8B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 3-8B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard30.4%—

Reasoning Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 15.7 (#313), Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 3-8B
Chess Puzzles0%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts13091133
DTBench48.8%43.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index123.5116.45
CritPt0%—
LMCA4.5%—
Adversarial NLI—57.3%
ForecastBench—58.6
WinoGrande—75.7%

Math Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 22.3 (#279), Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 3-8B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202516.7%1.9%
LMArena Math13071151
MATH Level 5—6.1%

Knowledge Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#257), Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 3-8B
GPQA Diamond39.5%26.1%
LMArena Expert12481113
Vectara Hallucination Rate4.4%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—82.8%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—82.6%
TriviaQA—67.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: —, Llama 3-8B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 3-8B
MindCube46.7%—

Multilingual Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 45.7 (#165), Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 3-8B
LMArena Non-English13181098
LMArena German13701104
LMArena Russian13351109
LMArena Chinese—1076
LMArena French—1159
LMArena Japanese—967
LMArena Korean—1004
LMArena Spanish—1173

Instruction Following Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 68.6 (#186), Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 3-8B
LMArena Instruction Following12991127

Long Context Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#162), Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 3-8B
LMArena Longer Query13171128

Writing & Preference Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 47.5 (#209), Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 3-8B
LMArena Text13341166
LMArena Creative Writing13311150
LMArena Multi-Turn13341152
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1126—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 12B better than Llama 3-8B?

Gemma 3 12B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3 12B or Llama 3-8B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (31.7 vs 31.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 12B and Llama 3-8B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 12B has 24 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-8B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper