Model comparison

Llama 3-8B vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.5

Rank #344 Confirmed

Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral AI

40.2

Rank #152 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-8B scores higher in 0 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 40.0 to 7.8.

Side by side

Llama 3-8B and Mistral Medium 3.5 specifications
Llama 3-8BMistral Medium 3.5
ProviderMetaMistral AI
Noometry Index25.540.2
Released2024-04-18—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—210K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked3422

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289), Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Coding11521461
LMArena WebDev—1264
BigCodeBench Instruct31.9%—
BigCodeBench Complete36.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+54.8%—

Reasoning Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326), Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Hard Prompts11331436
Epoch Capabilities Index116.45141.35
Kagi LLM Benchmark—41.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—12.9%
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench43.9%—
Adversarial NLI57.3%—
ForecastBench58.6—
WinoGrande75.7%—

Math Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323), Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Math11511431
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%—
MATH Level 56.1%—

Knowledge Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308), Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Expert11131432
GPQA Diamond26.1%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge82.8%—
MMLU68.8%—
OpenBookQA82.6%—
TriviaQA67.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 3-8B: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision—1223

Multilingual Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261), Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Non-English10981404
LMArena Chinese10761442
LMArena French11591448
LMArena German11041451
LMArena Korean10041385
LMArena Russian11091395
LMArena Spanish11731409
LMArena Japanese967—

Instruction Following Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260), Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Instruction Following11271415

Long Context Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251), Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Longer Query11281415

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256), Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text11661421
LMArena Creative Writing11501374
LMArena Multi-Turn11521423
EQ-Bench 4—993

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3-8B better than Mistral Medium 3.5?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3-8B or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?

Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3-8B and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-8B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper