Model comparison

Dolly 2.0-12b vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Dolly 2.0-12b Databricks

24.9

Rank #339 Confirmed

Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral AI

39.6

Rank #151 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 58.6 to 15.3.

Side by side

Dolly 2.0-12b and Mistral Medium 3.5 specifications
Dolly 2.0-12bMistral Medium 3.5
ProviderDatabricksMistral AI
Noometry Index24.939.6
Released2023-04-11—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—210K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked1722

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.0 (#327), Mistral Medium 3.5: 35.7 (#208)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Coding7761461
LMArena WebDev—1263

Reasoning Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 14.6 (#315), Mistral Medium 3.5: 16.6 (#290)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Hard Prompts8041436
Epoch Capabilities Index88.94141.42
Kagi LLM Benchmark—41.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—12.9%
HellaSwag70.8%—
PIQA75.4%—
WinoGrande61.8%—

Math Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 25.0 (#250), Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.4 (#113)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Math8711432

Knowledge Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.3 (#123)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Expert—1431
ARC (AI2) Challenge39.6%—
BoolQ56.3%—
MMLU26.2%—
OpenBookQA39.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 37.6 (#64)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision—1222

Multilingual Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#291), Mistral Medium 3.5: 52.1 (#93)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Non-English8361405
LMArena Chinese8361443
LMArena French—1448
LMArena German—1453
LMArena Korean—1387
LMArena Russian—1396
LMArena Spanish—1406

Instruction Following Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.9 (#299), Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.7 (#87)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Instruction Following8141414

Long Context Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#101)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Longer Query—1414

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#306), Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.6 (#113)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text8511421
LMArena Creative Writing8641372
LMArena Multi-Turn7401423
EQ-Bench 4—993

Frequently asked questions

Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Mistral Medium 3.5?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?

Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.7 versus 23.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper