Model comparison

Llama 3-8B vs Mistral

Mistral is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.4 to 25.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.3

Rank #338 Confirmed

Mistral Mistral AI

29.4

Rank #297 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-8B scores higher in 2 categories and Mistral in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Mistral leads 20.5 to 8.3.
  • Llama 3-8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3-8B and Mistral specifications
Llama 3-8BMistral
ProviderMetaMistral AI
Noometry Index25.329.4
Released2024-04-18—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window8K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.14—
Output $ / M tokens$0.14—
Results tracked3422

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral leads

Llama 3-8B: 30.5 (#285), Mistral: 33.2 (#249)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMistral
LMArena Coding11521162
BigCodeBench Instruct31.9%—
BigCodeBench Complete36.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+54.8%—

Reasoning Mistral leads

Llama 3-8B: 13.8 (#321), Mistral: 21.3 (#199)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMistral
LMArena Hard Prompts11331149
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench43.9%—
Adversarial NLI57.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index116.33—
ForecastBench58.6—
WinoGrande75.7%—

Math Mistral leads

Llama 3-8B: 8.3 (#317), Mistral: 20.5 (#275)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMistral
LMArena Math11511180
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%—
Omni-MATH—7.2%
MATH Level 56.1%—

Knowledge Mistral leads

Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#303), Mistral: 16.3 (#283)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMistral
LMArena Expert11131125
GPQA Diamond26.1%—
MMLU-Pro—27.7%
GPQA (HELM)—30.3%
ARC (AI2) Challenge82.8%—
MMLU68.8%—
OpenBookQA82.6%—
TriviaQA67.7%—

Multilingual Mistral leads

Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#256), Mistral: 33.0 (#249)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMistral
LMArena Non-English10981129
LMArena Chinese10761109
LMArena French11581179
LMArena German11041155
LMArena Japanese9671012
LMArena Korean10031032
LMArena Russian11091168
LMArena Spanish11721143

Instruction Following Llama 3-8B leads

Llama 3-8B: 58.7 (#255), Mistral: 52.9 (#283)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMistral
LMArena Instruction Following11271152
IFEval—56.8%

Long Context Too close to call

Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#246), Mistral: 35.0 (#240)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMistral
LMArena Longer Query11281154

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Llama 3-8B: 37.7 (#251), Mistral: 37.2 (#255)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMistral
LMArena Text11661165
LMArena Creative Writing11501158
LMArena Multi-Turn11521147
WildBench—66%

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3-8B better than Mistral?

Mistral is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.4 to 25.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3-8B or Mistral better for coding?

Mistral scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.2 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3-8B and Mistral share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-8B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Mistral has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper