Model comparison

Llama 3-8B vs Magistral Medium

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.5

Rank #344 Confirmed

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

35.2

Rank #227 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-8B scores higher in 1 category and Magistral Medium in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Magistral Medium leads 35.1 to 8.8.

Side by side

Llama 3-8B and Magistral Medium specifications
Llama 3-8BMagistral Medium
ProviderMetaMistral AI
Noometry Index25.535.2
Released2024-04-182025-03-17
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$5
Results tracked3422

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Magistral Medium leads

Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289), Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMagistral Medium
LMArena Coding11521319
SciCode—39.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct31.9%—
BigCodeBench Complete36.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+54.8%—

Reasoning Llama 3-8B leads

Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326), Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMagistral Medium
LMArena Hard Prompts11331267
ARC-AGI-2—0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—16.2%
ARC-AGI-1—6.1%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench43.9%—
Adversarial NLI57.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index116.45—
ForecastBench58.6—
WinoGrande75.7%—

Math Magistral Medium leads

Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323), Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMagistral Medium
LMArena Math11511250
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%—
MATH Level 56.1%—

Knowledge Magistral Medium leads

Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308), Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMagistral Medium
LMArena Expert11131223
GPQA Diamond26.1%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge82.8%—
MMLU68.8%—
OpenBookQA82.6%—
TriviaQA67.7%—

Multilingual Magistral Medium leads

Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261), Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMagistral Medium
LMArena Non-English10981232
LMArena Chinese10761227
LMArena French11591267
LMArena German11041248
LMArena Japanese9671175
LMArena Korean10041125
LMArena Russian11091224
LMArena Spanish11731271

Instruction Following Magistral Medium leads

Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260), Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMagistral Medium
LMArena Instruction Following11271254

Long Context Magistral Medium leads

Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251), Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMagistral Medium
LMArena Longer Query11281295

Writing & Preference Magistral Medium leads

Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256), Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMagistral Medium
LMArena Text11661255
LMArena Creative Writing11501245
LMArena Multi-Turn11521275

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3-8B better than Magistral Medium?

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3-8B or Magistral Medium better for coding?

Magistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3-8B and Magistral Medium share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-8B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper