Model comparison
Dolly 2.0-12b vs Magistral Medium
Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
Mistral AISummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 1 category and Magistral Medium in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Magistral Medium leads 46.3 to 15.2.
Side by side
| Dolly 2.0-12b | Magistral Medium | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 35.2 |
| Released | 2023-04-11 | 2025-03-17 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $5 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Magistral Medium leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1319 |
| SciCode | — | 39.2% |
Reasoning Dolly 2.0-12b leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1267 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 16.2% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 6.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | — |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |
Math Magistral Medium leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1250 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1223 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |
Multilingual Magistral Medium leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1232 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1227 |
| LMArena French | — | 1267 |
| LMArena German | — | 1248 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1175 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1125 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1224 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1271 |
Instruction Following Magistral Medium leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1254 |
Long Context Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1295 |
Writing & Preference Magistral Medium leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1255 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1245 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1275 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Magistral Medium?
Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Magistral Medium better for coding?
Magistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Magistral Medium share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.