Model comparison

Granite 4.1 8b vs Llama 3-70B

Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.8 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.1 8b IBM

36.8

Rank #202 Confirmed

Llama 3-70B Meta

28.5

Rank #317 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 8b scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 3-70B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Granite 4.1 8b leads 33.8 to 12.0.

Side by side

Granite 4.1 8b and Llama 3-70B specifications
Granite 4.1 8bLlama 3-70B
ProviderIBMMeta
Noometry Index36.828.5
Released—2024-04-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1331

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3-70B leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 29.9 (#291), Llama 3-70B: 35.3 (#215)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bLlama 3-70B
LMArena Coding13131206
LMArena WebDev1190—
BigCodeBench Instruct—43.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—54.5%
HumanEval+—72%
MBPP+—69%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.1 8b: —, Llama 3-70B: 20.9 (#132)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bLlama 3-70B
Cybench—5%

Reasoning Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 24.6 (#142), Llama 3-70B: 17.4 (#284)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bLlama 3-70B
LMArena Hard Prompts12941195
Kagi LLM Benchmark—35.1%
DTBench—54.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—122.91
ForecastBench—57.1
WinoGrande—83.5%

Math Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 33.8 (#167), Llama 3-70B: 12.0 (#299)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bLlama 3-70B
LMArena Math13111218
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.3%
MATH Level 5—22.6%

Knowledge Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 35.5 (#171), Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#272)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bLlama 3-70B
LMArena Expert13101149
GPQA Diamond—40.6%
MMLU—79.3%

Multilingual Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 41.8 (#199), Llama 3-70B: 33.8 (#246)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bLlama 3-70B
LMArena Non-English12611142
LMArena Chinese13351114
LMArena Russian12381159
LMArena French—1231
LMArena German—1169
LMArena Japanese—1017
LMArena Korean—1017
LMArena Spanish—1241

Instruction Following Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 67.0 (#198), Llama 3-70B: 62.8 (#233)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bLlama 3-70B
LMArena Instruction Following12681194

Long Context Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#188), Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#235)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bLlama 3-70B
LMArena Longer Query12751174

Writing & Preference Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 48.3 (#199), Llama 3-70B: 43.0 (#225)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bLlama 3-70B
LMArena Text12911221
LMArena Creative Writing12491210
LMArena Multi-Turn12691223

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.1 8b better than Llama 3-70B?

Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.8 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.1 8b or Llama 3-70B better for coding?

Llama 3-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.3 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and Llama 3-70B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper