Model comparison

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct vs o4-mini

o4-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.6 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index. Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct costs 12× less per token, which makes it the better buy when o4-mini's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 31 shared benchmarks.

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct Meta

30.6

Rank #291 Confirmed

o4-mini OpenAI

41.6

Rank #132 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 31 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and o4-mini in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where o4-mini leads 40.8 to 15.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 5.1% for Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and 81.7% for o4-mini.
  • Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.32 per million input/output tokens, against $1.10 / $4.40 for o4-mini.
  • o4-mini accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 128K.
  • Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and o4-mini specifications
Llama-3.3-70B-Instructo4-mini
ProviderMetaOpenAI
Noometry Index30.641.6
Released2024-12-062025-04-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K200K
Max output4K100K
Input $ / M tokens$0.10$1.10
Output $ / M tokens$0.32$4.40
Results tracked4360

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o4-mini leads

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 31.0 (#290), o4-mini: 40.9 (#127)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama-3.3-70B-Instructo4-mini
WeirdML14.4%52.6%
LMArena Coding12681368
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—45%
Aider Polyglot—72%
SciCode26%—
GSO—3.6%
BigCodeBench Instruct46.9%—
LiveBench Coding36.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.5%—
CadEval—62%
ALE-Bench—826.17
AlgoTune—1.72

Agentic & Tool Use o4-mini leads

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 25.8 (#105), o4-mini: 32.6 (#61)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama-3.3-70B-Instructo4-mini
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard31.9%53.2%
GDPval—25.3%
BALROG23%—
METR Time Horizons—63.9%

Reasoning o4-mini leads

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 14.1 (#327), o4-mini: 24.6 (#162)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama-3.3-70B-Instructo4-mini
SimpleBench19.9%38.7%
CritPt0%0.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts12571351
DTBench59.5%77.6%
LMCA17.5%26.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index127.33145.64
ForecastBench58.661.8
ARC-AGI-2—6.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—67.6%
ARC-AGI-1—58.7%
Chess Puzzles—26%
EnigmaEval—9.2%
LiveBench Reasoning50.8%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—5%
LiveBench Data Analysis49.5%—
LiveBench50.2%—

Math o4-mini leads

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 15.3 (#298), o4-mini: 40.8 (#89)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama-3.3-70B-Instructo4-mini
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20255.1%81.7%
LMArena Math12671389
MATH Level 541.6%97.8%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—36.1%
FrontierMath Tier 4—4.9%
Omni-MATH—72%
LiveBench Math42.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—24.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—6.3%

Knowledge o4-mini leads

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 30.6 (#226), o4-mini: 43.6 (#91)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama-3.3-70B-Instructo4-mini
GPQA Diamond47.4%79.6%
Confabulations22.8%15.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate4.1%18.6%
LMArena Expert12251343
Humanity's Last Exam—18.1%
SimpleQA Verified—19.6%
MMLU-Pro—82%
GPQA (HELM)—73.5%
MMLU86.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: —, o4-mini: 40.2 (#49)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama-3.3-70B-Instructo4-mini
LMArena Vision—1194
GeoBench—64%
VPCT—57.5%

Multilingual o4-mini leads

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 39.9 (#220), o4-mini: 47.0 (#154)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama-3.3-70B-Instructo4-mini
LMArena Non-English12361337
LMArena Chinese12171354
LMArena French12811364
LMArena German12511336
LMArena Japanese11501308
LMArena Korean11431312
LMArena Russian12521334
LMArena Spanish12701347

Instruction Following o4-mini leads

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 71.1 (#157), o4-mini: 75.2 (#68)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama-3.3-70B-Instructo4-mini
LMArena Instruction Following12421321
LiveBench Instruction Following82.7%—
IFEval—92.8%

Long Context o4-mini leads

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 26.4 (#295), o4-mini: 45.5 (#33)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama-3.3-70B-Instructo4-mini
Fiction.LiveBench33.3%77.8%
LMArena Longer Query12561315

Writing & Preference o4-mini leads

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 47.6 (#207), o4-mini: 54.0 (#152)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama-3.3-70B-Instructo4-mini
LMArena Text12741353
LMArena Creative Writing12501294
LMArena Multi-Turn12801350
Short-Story Creative Writing—75%
WildBench—85.4%
LiveBench Language39.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct better than o4-mini?

o4-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.6 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index. Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct costs 12× less per token, which makes it the better buy when o4-mini's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct or o4-mini?

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.32 per million output tokens; o4-mini lists at $1.10 and $4.40.

Is Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct or o4-mini better for coding?

o4-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

o4-mini does, with 200K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and o4-mini share?

31 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct has 43 scored results on Noometry and o4-mini has 60.

Related comparisons

Go deeper