Model comparison
Llama 3.2 90B vs Wizardlm 13b
Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Wizardlm 13b leads 30.2 to 11.1.
Side by side
| Llama 3.2 90B | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 27.5 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2024-09-24 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1035 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.2 90B leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1018 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |
Math Wizardlm 13b leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1017 |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1023 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1048 |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Wizardlm 13b?
Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Wizardlm 13b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.