Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Wizardlm 13b
Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Wizardlm 13b leads 30.2 to 9.3.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1035 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning Wizardlm 13b leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1018 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
Math Wizardlm 13b leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1017 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1048 |
Long Context Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Wizardlm 13b?
Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.2 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.